Apache Binaries Available for PS2 Linux 183
cant_get_a_good_nick writes: "From ApacheWeek, probably the best net resource for Apache, comes the announcement of a binary build of Apache 2.0.39 for PS2 Linux. You too can have a server farm for web serving, and GTA3. Be nice and don't kill this guy's downloads page."
Neet. (Score:3, Interesting)
Now as far as coolness factor, OTOH...
Exactly! (Score:1, Insightful)
Right. Most console hardware blows chunks. There's no other word to describe it. You know what the important things in a console are? Sound and video.
Every cool thing like this I've seen has something to do with turning a console into a server. Servers do not need sound and video. To put it geekily, if you proposed this as a Borg, they'd deactivate you for your lack of efficiency.
I'm not even sure this is cool any more. They've been tossing Linux on consoles since the Dreamcast (at least).. And some guy had a webserver running off a C= 64 awhile back.
I mean, I respect the efforts of those who brought us Apache on the PS2, but only from a technical standpoint. As far as cool, though, porting to consoles has become All Your Base - just not as funny.
Re:Exactly! (Score:3)
This, if I may be so bold, is total garbage. Consoles may not have much hardware, but what they do have smashes all those crappy ia32 machines - armed with a hardware mindset that even Bill Gates was moved to call "brain dead" a decade and half ago (well, almost - 12, 15, who's counting?) - that we are all using into outer space.
$50 buys you a Dreamcast - better graphics than a PCI graphics card for the same price.
Re:Exactly! (Score:3)
Only now, 2 years later, has Sony figured out how to graft on a VGA interface to its PS2. And that VGA interface requires rewriting software and will only work with Sync-On-Green monitors.
Sega was so far ahead of its time, it's not even funny.
Re:Neet. (Score:2)
Webserver (Score:2, Insightful)
Another bizarre, ridiculous and completely useless application of the technology.
Re:Webserver (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Webserver (Score:1)
You DO realize your sig is probably setting off uptime pissing wars all over Slashdot, right?
Re:Webserver (Score:5, Insightful)
Which is exactly why it's so cool.
Dave
Re:Webserver (Score:1)
Anyone want to try Windows XP and IIS on a PS2? Didn't think so.
Re:Webserver (Score:2)
Re:Webserver (Score:1)
Anyone up to the challenge?
In that case... (Score:2)
Oh, damn.... it's already been done [nofuncharlie.com].
Re:Webserver (Score:5, Interesting)
Only if you have no imagination. At work, there's a rack-mount web server that's basically an appliance that somebody bought for used for $300. They say it originally cost over $2,000. The nice thing about this type of appliance is that it has few parts to go bad on it. However, it does suffer from lack of features. (It's basically just an HTTP server, no PHP support etc...)
Well, they got Apache running on a PS2. That means that PHP and all those other fun features of it will (presumably) work as well. I don't think it's too far away from burning a DVD, popping it in the PS2, turning it on, and boom you have a webserver running. The neat thing is that this $199 (new, and will always get cheaper) device should, in theory, stay up to date with Apache.
PS2's will eventually go the way of the Dreamcast, and will reach ridiculously low ($50) prices. Personally, I'd rather set one of those things up once and reboot once in a while rather than having to maintain a machine with failing hard-drives and so on. If the thing breaks, buy it with one of those 1 year warranties for $20 and have them swap out with a new one. Heh. I bet you can't get a web appliance with that kinda guarantee! Setup is a breeze!
I'm tempted to look into how to build a PC that boots off a flash card so I can remove all of the moving parts from it. That'd last forever, I bet. Actually, if anybody knows of a good place to find that info, fire a link to me. (I'll do a Google search later, but I'd much rather hear from somebody who's gone down that road.) In the mean time, I have finally found an interesting use for a PS2!
Cheers.
Re:Webserver (Score:1)
Either that or you are limited to a very small website, of say only 16 Mb (the other 16M being used for Linux, Apache, etc.)
And it is still a huge waste of such a device. You could build a webserver that does the same thing (read-only small website) for much less than the price of a PS2. Like the LART [tudelft.nl] project, for example.
Re:Webserver (Score:2)
I envisioned that the pages would be served up from a small 8-meg RAM disk.
You bring up an excellent point about the limitations of the machine. I wasn't picturing a huge site in my mind, I was picturing something like a small 'brochure' kind of site. Don't they make a 40-gig hard-drive for the PS-2, though?
Re:Webserver (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Webserver (Score:1)
Jaysyn
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Webserver (Score:1)
Jaysyn
Re:Webserver (Score:2)
-1 Stupid
Posts like the parent are living proof of a dire need for this option. Everyone knows that the ps2 linux kit comes with a hard drive by now, and adding a larger one is probably a trivial task.
Re:Webserver (Score:2)
http://www.soekris.com/
Dave
Re:Webserver (Score:2)
Hmmmm what about PS2 games?
moving parts that don't break (Score:2)
depending on your budget, if you want reliable hardware with moving parts which do not break, you might wanna look at refurbed or new apple hardware.
Back in early '96 i bought Apple's first "PCI Mac", the PowerPC 7500/100. The thing has been on 24/7 every single day for the last 6 years and has run a slew of operating systems, and i have crashed the thing many, many times while never corrupting a single hard drive.
While in college, i used it as a TV, video capture platform, web surfing, web serving, web authoring, C programming tool.
Then it was used for about 3 years as a dedicated web server on a T1 connection, serving filemaker-pro-db/lasso/webstar-driven sites [barakatgallery.com] for multiple clients until they'd migrate to their own boxes.
And for the last two years it has been happily sitting on my kitchen table running LinuxPPC Q4 2000 24/7 serving some hobby sites of mine off of my DSL connection [earthlink.net]
I've upgraded its processor to a 250mhz G3, added an Ultra2 LVD SCSI card, a 9gig 8.5ms 10,000 rpm IBM cheetah hard drive, boosted the ram to 200MB (could be up to 1gig in theory) and other nifty things.
I've been opening the case and cleaning its guts about once every 2 years whenever i fellt the need to mess with it.
in any case, it has been my experience that apple hardware just doesn't break, no matter how much i fuck with it. I still see 5 year-old apple laptops still running MacOS 8.5 and allowing you to surf the 'net. Sure the battery no-longer holds a charge, which is to be expected, but once the power supply is plugged-in, they still work.
and i bet you could get an old 100mhz PPC 7500 CPU for around $300.
Re:moving parts that don't break (Score:2)
Re:I second that emotion (Score:2)
back in like '93 i remember visiting some french local cable channel broadcasting company who would constantly rotate local advertising "slides" thru their channel, which would be exclusively handled 24/7/365 by a couple of those early lower-end "AV" macs using Macromedia Director scheduled presentations. one box was like for development/staging/testing, the other one was the live box. the tech guy there told us apple wasn't too thrilled they'd put their hardware thru that kind of stress, but that the thing had been doing just fine for like a year and still not flinching.
Shit man '93 was like still early versions of "System 7". heh. Back during the days of "windows 3.1", to put things in perspective.
Re:Webserver (Score:1)
The thieves here are still trying to charge about $900.
Nope. (Score:2)
I realized I was thinking of the Xbox..
If there's one thing that sucks to buy here it's electronics. Everyone just buys them from the states and sends them here.. way cheaper. It's rather silly.
Re:Webserver (Score:2)
You too can be a computer nerd! (Score:2)
Woah (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Woah (Score:1)
Re:Woah (Score:2)
Three web-servers?
Can't the Dreamcast handle the load of both your friends visiting it? Heh.
Re:Woah (Score:2)
$W33t (Score:2, Funny)
Re:$W33t (Score:1)
No they shouldn't... (Score:1)
Like that will ever happen (Score:2, Funny)
That's like standing in front of the running of the bulls and asking for them to spare you -- it's just not going to happen!
Re:Like that will ever happen (Score:1)
Now that's responsible journalism.
Re:Like that will ever happen (Score:1)
kill the server? (Score:1)
XBOX (Score:1)
Re:XBOX (Score:1)
I'm waiting for the xBox. (Score:2, Insightful)
Regards, Adam.
Re:I'm waiting for the xBox. (Score:2)
If you hadn't noticed yet, the PS2 can run linux and Sony supports it. OTOH, the XBox can't run linux and MS will never support it, in reality, they've done all they can to prevent it thus far.
Let's do some more comparisons if/when the XBox runs linux and there's a post about Apache running on linux/Xbox ok?
Re:I'm waiting for the xBox. (Score:2)
Foot, meet mouth. You're gonna be spending a lot of time together.
Re:I'm waiting for the xBox. (Score:2)
"If you wait, there will always be a cheaper and faster computer later. But while you wait you have nothing." I see a PS2/Linux box acting as a webserver today. I don't see the XBox doing the same.
Being the one who sometimes submits kernel updates (Score:3, Funny)
--pi
Re:Being the one who sometimes submits kernel upda (Score:2, Insightful)
Read his announcement, it was non-trivial.
And we had the Lego mathematical models a few days ago, anyone can click Legos. He did it cause it was cool, and thought the community at large would like it. And it's on Slashdot cause using a game machine for doing real work is kinda cool to a geek.
Re:Being the one who sometimes submits kernel upda (Score:2)
--j
Re:Being the one who sometimes submits kernel upda (Score:3, Insightful)
The greater benefit of downloading pre-compiled binaries for PS2/Linux is that compiling things on the PS2 takes a very long time. Compiling xmame for example, takes roughly 2-3 hours.
comon... (Score:2, Funny)
"A guy is running apache on a timex watch!! heres the link to his site"
5 hits later, the site goes down.
angry
a) "its
b) "heres the google cache, gimme karma now!"
comon ppl...
Re:comon... (Score:2)
c) clever link to goatse.cx disguised as a google cache link along with the words "frist pots!!!"
Rack Mount Kit? (Score:3, Insightful)
How else is one supposed to make a decent server farm out of these? Has anyone done any serious benchmarking of Linux on this hardware? What's the price/performace for one of these doing (tiff to) pnm to png conversions? (I have the need for small cluster for that, have been looking into AMD's)
I am only half joking.
-Pete
Re:Rack Mount Kit? (Score:1)
Re:Rack Mount Kit? (Score:2)
Although it is harder to find the broadband adapter. But getting a DC for ~$50 brings the price to $150, plus no mod chip.
I was considering getting a kit (Score:1, Funny)
Maybe we should just buy another PS2 now that they've come down in price so much....no there's an idea!
Re:I was considering getting a kit (Score:2)
i have no idea what you look like but
Re:I was considering getting a kit (Score:1, Offtopic)
My apologies for feeding the trolls. But this one is just plain desperate. Dude. Turn off the screen, go out and find yourself a date before you masturbate yourself into oblivion. You're gonna go blind, dude.
All well and good (Score:5, Funny)
Re:All well and good (Score:1)
Re:All well and good (Score:2)
Awesome! (Score:3, Funny)
Oh wait.
No.
It was to play "Gran Turismo".
- A.P.
We'll Behave (Score:1)
Be nice and don't kill this guy's downloads page.
As deterrant as telling children they may get their own cookies from the jar, but to take only one.
GTA3 and webserving? (Score:3, Funny)
Well you don't really need a PS2 running Linux to do that. Just use a Windows 2000 box running Apache, then you can serve web pages while playing GTA 3.
You can't do that on a PS2!!!
Re:GTA3 and webserving? (Score:1)
I like it because I can finger twatt.
Re:GTA3 and webserving? (Score:1)
Re:GTA3 and webserving? (Score:2)
Too bad the game's not as fancy as Quake when it comes to settings. It does NOT degrade gracefully.
It wouldn't take much horsepower to get Apache to spit out a page within 90 seconds.
Re:GTA3 and webserving? (Score:2)
I'm sure it's my card.
Re:GTA3 and webserving? (Score:2)
The game runs just fine until it starts raining, then the cops come after me with the helicopter.
Unless P4s behave better with Nvidia drivers. I've heard of other cards with 'special optimizations for P4'. No idea if Geforce 4s are part of that or not, though.
Or I'm just wrong.
Re:GTA3 and webserving? (Score:2)
I was running a Matrox G550, and the 3d on it was HORRID. *Not dissatisfied*
That's Cool (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:That's Cool (Score:1, Informative)
Re:That's Cool (Score:2)
(Anybody who remembers Sony's 'The PS2 can handle 66 million invisible polys a second' marketing will find that amusing.)
Brilliant! (Score:2)
Me either...
Mirrored here.. (Score:1)
Ironic (Score:2, Interesting)
The site www.phi-web.co.uk is running Apache/1.3.22 (Unix) [...] on FreeBSD. [netcraft.com]
Similar Win95 bug (Score:1)
Additionally HP-UX, Linux, Solaris and recent releases of FreeBSD cycle back to zero after 497 days
That's because they store uptime as centiseconds in a 32-bit integer. Windows 95 (before service packs) had a bug that limited uptime to 49.7 days because its count of milliseconds since startup would wrap, and it wasn't prepared to handle that situation.
Be nice? (Score:3, Insightful)
Why post a link if you don't want people to click on it? Why not include a list of users with the story, so we know who is allowed to click on the link and who is not? This way, we won't exceed our quota.
That's rediculous, I know. But saying "be nice..." in this context just says to me "hehehe I know all about this thing called the Slashdot effect, but I don't really care. Just to make it a bit funnier, though, I'll tell everyone to 'be nice' in my most sarcastic tone."
bw (Score:1)
GIVE ME A BREAK! (Score:1)
Re:GIVE ME A BREAK! (Score:1)
Because gaming companies usually take a hit on the hardware portion of the game console system and hope to get their profits on games instead. Consumers will be more likely to invest in a cheap hardware system not knowing the extreme markup of the games. If the systems are cheap enough, geeks can get a bunch of them and save on the hardware costs compared with buying conventional hardware.
I havn't worked it out price / performance ratio-wise, but I think it is not totally out of the question. Regardless, it is a cool thing to do.
Re:GIVE ME A BREAK! (Score:2)
How hard is apache to compile? (Score:1)
I built Apache 2 on a Pentium 100 running OpenBSD (and ended up using the 1.3.x binaries that came with it anyway:) and it only took a couple of hours. How bad could it be on a machine that has not only 3 times the clock speed, but many more times the raw processing power?
Now X11 or Mozilla (it's sad when a web browser takes nearly the same amount of time to build as a windowing system, but I digress) might be bad, but I can't see a huge chunk of time for Apache.
All I want is a debian build. (Score:1)
Ever so critical (Score:2, Funny)
I can't figure out what "makes" a story here, I've seen readers praise less interesting re-invented wheels than this one. I could cure cancer and you guys would say "so", but let some guy setup Linux to auto-flush his toilet and he'd be a hero.
perhaps (Score:2)
but for the cost of Sony's Linux kit and a PS2, you could certainly have much more computing power than a 300 MHZ processor if ya knew *anything* about computers...
And if ya didnt know anything about computers, would ya be running Linux on a PS2?
Re:perhaps (Score:1)
You're making the assumption that one has to be a Slashdot Linux nerd to want to get interested in running linux on a PS2. I think the PS2 getting Linux, Apache, and etc. can spark the interest of others who aren't like us. The kit isn't useful to me right now. It doesn't sound like it is to you either.... but none of this means that it doesn't serve a logical purpose for others.
misinformed. (Score:1)
i look forward to sony's reaction when.... (Score:2, Funny)
.
Irony (Score:5, Insightful)
It's kind of funny - Sony, known for its extremely successful Playstation, wants the PS2 to be more like a PC. Microsoft, known just about only in computers, wants the Xbox to be seen only as a gaming console (and/or "entertainment hub").
Sony distributes and supports Linux for its systems, while Microsoft is doing everything they can to stop (non-Microsoft-licensed, therefore not profiting MS directly) PC software from running on their gaming-console/entertainment-hub.
"Hobbyists" port and program software for the PS2, while "hackers" port and program software for the Xbox. (actually I'm pretty sure hackers are doing/have done more to the PS2 right now)
Sony's plan is probably to attack MS in the computer market, what with recent announcements of OS experience they've gained from the Linux project and the Vaio and the handheld Clie and the such. Microsoft's plan is to penetrate the entertainment market, a place where Sony, ironically (or coincidentally?), happens to have a strong foothold in (although I prefer Panasonic, myself, but my friend's Sony VVega is nothing to scoff at).
And through this all, Nintendo sits, GameCube in hand, planning on how to continue in the console gaming market. With the recent retirement of Nintendo mastermind and uber-zombie President Hiroshi Yamauchi, and the recent announcements of the company focusing more on software than hardware, it's anybody's guess as to what is going on at Nintendo of Japan headquarters.
(Don't even begin on the handheld gaming market - Nintendo owned that market for 10 years with a handheld that could only do spinach green and black sprites, and GBA will probably last at least another 5 on its own).
Imagine a ... (Score:3, Funny)
cross-compiling (Score:2)
Sure it's a great Web server... (Score:1)
But can we get windows emulation with direct x support?
Streaming media (Score:1)
Huh? (Score:3, Informative)
As far as i'm concerned, i'd rather hear about developers porting over applications/libraries/new linux kernels which need modification to run on the PS2 architecture.
Re:Hmmmm... (Score:1)
Re:Smile! (Score:2)
Re:Can you even imagine... (Score:1, Funny)