Apache 1.3.x vs. 2.0.x: The Debate Returns

Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apache 1.3.x vs. 2.0.x: The Debate Returns

Load All Comments

Search 95 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

i've been using both (Score:4, Informative)

by dcocos ( 128532 ) writes:

I've been using both 1.3.x and 2.x with Tomcat and I have yet to really notice a difference except that the config files for 2.x seem to be laid out in a more sane order though it took a while to adjust. (I can't speak to PHP usage as the only time I touch it is for running squirrelmail)
- Re:i've been using both (Score:0)
  
  by Anonymous Coward writes: on Tuesday March 23, 2004 @10:55AM (#8644673)
  
  What connector are you using with each?
  
  Parent Share
  twitter facebook
  - Re:i've been using both (Score:3, Informative)
    
    by dcocos ( 128532 ) writes:
    
    On the Debian box I'm using 1.3.29 with mod_jk 1.2 with Java 1.4.0
    on the Gentoo box I'm using 2.0.48 mod_jk2 2.0.2 with Java 1.4.2_04
    - Re:i've been using both (Score:2)
      
      by tcopeland ( 32225 ) * writes:
      
      Yup, same here:
      
      - Apache 2.0.48
      - mod_jk 2.0.2
      - mod_php 4.3.4
      - JDK 1.4.2_03
      
      on SemWebCentral [semwebcentral.org]. Runnin' fine so far...

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

Apache 1.3.x vs. 2.0.x: The Debate Returns More Login

Apache 1.3.x vs. 2.0.x: The Debate Returns

i've been using both (Score:4, Informative)

Re:i've been using both (Score:0)

Re:i've been using both (Score:3, Informative)

Re:i've been using both (Score:2)