LibreOffice has added more Calc functions than AOO. LO also has patched up UNO allowing for faster run and has added wrappers for VBA scripts into UNO calls. OOXML support in AAO is horrible, LO has greatly improved OOXML since the split. The backends for Base in LO is moving away from Java, slowly, but eventually Java will not be needed unless you need JDBC connectivity. LO included recent ODF updates that allow font embedding in documents, AOO lacks this ability.
I have a 10 year old computer that used to lag running OO, but the past few years it runs libreoffice without any problems.
The thing Sun wrote was bloated and slow. OO added a lot of features. LO is basically "finished" IMO.
One of the great things about IBM, when their old software sucks, they deprecate it. There was a time they were even bribing their professional services clients to switch from AIX to Linux, because AIX didn't have any use case other than "change is hard." Not very much of the software I
Sun didn't write it; they bought StarOffice from the german companyStarDivision (or some such)
I''d used StarOffice since 1.x, except for the horrific 4.x with the "feature" of its own desktop.
Sun's vision was a return to powerful central computers, but this time with smart to very smart terminals. Your session could follow you from one to another, as it was really running centrally.
They needed an office suite to run on the center, and StarOffice already ran on X.
Done! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:5, Informative)
Depends on what you mean by finished?
LibreOffice has added more Calc functions than AOO. LO also has patched up UNO allowing for faster run and has added wrappers for VBA scripts into UNO calls. OOXML support in AAO is horrible, LO has greatly improved OOXML since the split. The backends for Base in LO is moving away from Java, slowly, but eventually Java will not be needed unless you need JDBC connectivity. LO included recent ODF updates that allow font embedding in documents, AOO lacks this ability.
Re: (Score:5, Interesting)
I have a 10 year old computer that used to lag running OO, but the past few years it runs libreoffice without any problems.
The thing Sun wrote was bloated and slow. OO added a lot of features. LO is basically "finished" IMO.
One of the great things about IBM, when their old software sucks, they deprecate it. There was a time they were even bribing their professional services clients to switch from AIX to Linux, because AIX didn't have any use case other than "change is hard." Not very much of the software I
Re: (Score:2)
Sun didn't write it; they bought StarOffice from the german companyStarDivision (or some such)
I''d used StarOffice since 1.x, except for the horrific 4.x with the "feature" of its own desktop.
Sun's vision was a return to powerful central computers, but this time with smart to very smart terminals. Your session could follow you from one to another, as it was really running centrally.
They needed an office suite to run on the center, and StarOffice already ran on X.
As their plan was to make the money from the
Re:Done! (Score:2)
In college they taught single document interface and multiple document interface as a personal preference, with no best practices.
Now they teach some nonsense about how even having features confuses the user.