I've never understood why they were so keen on helping Oracle thumb their nose at LibreOffice the rest of the FOSS community. My opinion of them took a nosedive when they did that, as I'm sure did many others'. What was the point, exactly?
Shame on Apache for accepting OpenOffice and dashing the dreams of spiteful little pricks. I'm mean WTF? How dare they act like a mature organization. Don't they know that the driving force of all open source projects is spite? They need to get in line and be whiny little bitches like everyone else.
Apache and OpenOffice (Score:5, Insightful)
I've never understood why they were so keen on helping Oracle thumb their nose at LibreOffice the rest of the FOSS community. My opinion of them took a nosedive when they did that, as I'm sure did many others'. What was the point, exactly?
Re: (Score:0)
Shame on Apache for accepting OpenOffice and dashing the dreams of spiteful little pricks. I'm mean WTF? How dare they act like a mature organization. Don't they know that the driving force of all open source projects is spite? They need to get in line and be whiny little bitches like everyone else.
Was that what you intended to sound like?
Re:Apache and OpenOffice (Score:2)
Interesting you should put it that way. Would you call Oracle's handling of the whole thing "mature"?
Re: (Score:2)
We're talking about what Apache did in relation to Oracle and OpenOffice/LibreOffice, which makes Oracle's actions very relevant.